Showing posts with label Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Summer IV - V. The Sabbath + the “help” + Françoise




Intro & Preface & Contents

Previous: Summer III. Izaak Walton



It is Sunday morning, and above earth’s beauty shines the purest, softest sky this summer has yet gladdened us withal. My window is thrown open; I see the sunny gleam upon garden leaves and flowers; I hear the birds whose wont it is to sing to me; ever and anon the martins that have their home beneath my eaves sweep past in silence. Church bells have begun to chime; I know the music of their voices, near and far.


There was a time when it delighted me to flash my satire on the English Sunday; I could see nothing but antiquated foolishness and modern hypocrisy in this weekly pause from labour and from bustle. Now I prize it as an inestimable boon, and dread every encroachment upon its restful stillness. Scoff as I might at “Sabbatarianism,” was I not always glad when Sunday came? ... This day of the seven I granted to my better genius; work was put aside, and, when Heaven permitted, trouble forgotten.


... Think as one may of its significance, our Day of Rest has a peculiar sanctity, felt, I imagine, in a more or less vague way, even by those who wish to see the village lads at cricket and theatres open in the town. The idea is surely as good a one as ever came to heavy-laden mortals; let one whole day in every week be removed from the common life of the world, lifted above common pleasures as above common cares... If its ancient use perish from among us, so much the worse for our country... With the decline of old faith, Sunday cannot but lose its sanction, and no loss among the enumerable that we are suffering will work so effectually for the popular vulgarization. What hope is there of guarding the moral beauty of the day when the authority which set it apart is no longer recognized? -- Imagine a bank-holiday once a week!


Alpha.  

In theory I like the idea of a day of the week set aside for reflection -- but why just a day? Also it would be unseemly for one, for whom old faith has declined to nothing, to support the trappings of that ancient institution.


V. Sabbath cont.



On Sunday I come down later than usual; I make a change of dress, for it is fitting that the day of spiritual rest should lay aside the livery of the laborious week. For me, indeed, there is no labour at any time, but nevertheless does Sunday bring me repose. I share in the common tranquility; my thought escapes the workaday world more completely than on other days.


It is not easy to see how this house of mine can make to itself a Sunday quiet, for at all times it is well-nigh soundless; yet I find a difference. My housekeeper comes into the room with her Sunday smile; she is happier for the day and the sight of her happiness gives me pleasure. She speaks, if possible, in a softer voice; she wears a garment which reminds me that there is only the lightest and cleanest housework to be done. She will go to church, morning and evening, and I know that she is better for it. During her absence I sometimes look into rooms which on other days I never enter; it is merely to gladden my eyes with the shining cleanliness, the perfect order, I am sure to find in the good woman’s domain. But for that spotless and sweet-smelling kitchen, what would it avail me to range my books and hang my pictures? All the tranquility of my life depends upon the honest care of this woman who lives and works unseen. And I am sure that the money I pay her is the least part of her reward. She is such an old-fashioned person that the mere discharge of what she deems a duty is in itself an end to her, and the work of her hands in itself a satisfaction, a pride.


When a child, I was permitted to handle on Sunday certain books which could not be exposed to the more careless usage of common days; volumes finely illustrated, or the more handsome editions of familiar authors, or works which, merely by their bulk, demanded special care. Happily, these books were all of the higher rank in literature, and so there came to be established in my mind an association between the day of rest and names which are the greatest in verse and prose...


Alpha.

Never have I longed to be a parent, to force my spawn upon the world. But the thought of introducing to someone, of encouraging the love of, my favorite cultural artifacts -- books, music, movies, TV shows -- is surely tempting. That, and the desire to see what your beloved might have been like as a child -- assuming, for me, a daughter and that she didn't, in character, skip a generation, as children are wont to do -- are the only reasons I can think of for wanting to have a child. But what are the odds that any of this would come to fruition?

As I said early, back in Spring II., this housekeeper is truly a utopian dream. I can’t imagine sharing a house with even so exemplary an employee. For one thing it would interfere with my idea of privacy, and I would be unable to relate to her as anything but an equal. I would arrange my life to make her’s easier. The “natural” relationship between the master and servant (wonderfully expressed in the short story The Second Time Around by M.F.K. Fisher) is completely foreign to me. This is not a boast; Ryecroft’s Mrs. M. would seem to have, from her point of view, a great gig. The housekeepers I periodically let in for a quick go at cleaning what I mostly fail to see, would probably envy her workload and steady income.


But I have to observe here, as we talk about the admittedly attractive aspects of the Sabbath, that for the housekeeper this is a day of less work rather than a day of rest. She is like the non-Jewish servants Jews like to employ so they have someone who can push buttons and nasty things like that on days their Sky Fairy says such actions are verboten. This reminds me of the elderly woman who would complain about my (a taxi driver) working on the Sabbath as I drove her to church. It’s assumed that some people will ignore the Sabbath to perform work that can’t be set aside. But where do you draw the line?


Also, the idea that “special” writers (Shakespeare, Milton, Homer) are best appreciated on “special” days reminds me of the tatami room in Japanese homes -- a special space from which to appreciate life. I actually prefer this spatial distinction to the temporal distinction, as you can take advantage of it at any time and it doesn't force the rest of the world to do something it can only imperfectly do. Of course I don’t have the physical space for such a room, but I still like the idea.


I can’t help thinking what authors and books I would set aside for special times. This book would certainly be on the list. The Decline and Fall and Wendell Berry’s essays. You don’t want anything both engrossing and long since you won’t be reading a whole book. Plutarch’s Lives would be good. Court of Memory by James McConkey and A Natural History of the Senses by Diane Ackerman or The Memoirs of a Superfluous Man by Albert Jay Nock would all work for me.


Beta.

If memory serves, this is the most we are going to get about Mrs. M., and I’ve already written something about servants and masters, so this is probably the place to say something about Françoise. I really had not expected to be referring to Proust and In Search of Lost Time here, but so I am. Proust is generally remembered as being obsessed with the aristocracy -- the Guermantes in his books. And this is certainly true enough, but, having read his endless book three times now, I have to say that the best parts, the most vivid and memorable characters, may be within “Marcel’s” own family: his bed-ridden aunt Léonie, his beloved grandmother and her two, too subtle sisters, his womanizing uncle Adolphe, and his father. But in some ways the best of all his characters is the servant Françoise. She is there from the beginning, when she still works for his aunt, through his infatuation with Gilbert, his trip to Balbec with his grandmother, and his affair with Albertine. I would love to see In Search of Lost Time rewritten from her point of view.


She is nothing like our Mrs. M. She is loyal and hardworking, to be sure, but she is not quiet, she has her flaws, and she most definitely has her own agenda. She is believable. If In Search of Lost Time were turned into a TV mini-series hers would be the best part for a character actress. The equivalent -- but greatly magnified -- of the Austen roles Sophie Thompson has played: Miss Bates and Mary Musgrove (née Eliott).

Next: Summer VI. Peace and war.

Monday, September 1, 2014

Summer III. Izaak Walton + the hijab



Intro & Preface & Contents

Previous: II. Traveling


Sitting in my garden amid the evening scent of roses, I have read through Walton’s Life of Hooker; could any place and time have been more appropriate? ... In other parts of England he must often have thought of these meadows falling to the green valley of the Exe, and of the sun setting behind the pines of Haldon. Hooker loved the country. Delightful to me, and infinitely touching, is that request of his to be transferred from London to a rural living -- “where I can see God’s blessing spring out of the earth.” And that glimpse of him where he was found tending sheep, with a Horace in his hand. It was in rural solitudes that he conceived the rhythm of mighty prose. What music of the spheres sang to that poor, vixen-haunted, pimply-faced man!


The last few pages I read by the light of the full moon, that of afterglow having till then sufficed me. Oh, why has it not been granted me in all my long years of pen-labour to write something small and perfect, even as one of these lives of honest Izaak? Let me be thankful that I have the mind to enjoy it; not only to understand, but to savour, its great goodness.


Alpha.

This mention of Izaak Walton and Richard Hooker sent me to Wikipedia for biographical information. Walton (1594–1683) is today best remembered for his The Compleat Angler. Hooker (1554–1600) reminds me to what extent the history of England is the history of religion. So much 20th century English literature is written from the RC point of view that it’s easy to forget that the real war for most of the 16th and 17th centuries (at least) was between Anglicans and Puritans, with Hooker being a key Anglican theological figure. Some products of this religious fervor were the Plantation of Ulster (1606-1700) and the Great Migration to Massachusetts (1620–1635).

Beta.

Speaking of religion. There is one custom that is commonly associated with a particular faith, but I wonder if its origin is really religious at all. I haven’t researched this subject extensively, but the first reference I know of, to women’s heads being covered to prevent their being seen by the public, is in Gibbon’s coverage of the Byzantine Empire in The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Was this one of Thorstein Veblen's status symbols that the Arabs copied from the Byzantines, or did the Byzantines get the idea from the Arabs? I don’t know. What I do know is who benefits from this odd custom. Regardless what people may say about a custom or how they officially justify it, I think it is always valuable to explore who benefits from the custom, and in the case of the covering up of a woman’s hair and face, there is really only one beneficiary I can see. Especially in the case of a culture that permits or encourages multiple marriages, the earlier wives, as they grow older, are likely to be out competed, in terms of looks and fertility, by younger women. With some ethnic groups -- the Chinese are a spectacular example -- a woman’s hair changes dramatically as she passes out of her fertile years. Women of a certain age have nothing to lose and everything to gain from a rule that requires all women to conceal their hair. Covering the face as well, is even better.

Next: Summer IV-V. The Sabbath.

Monday, August 18, 2014

Spring XII. Books


Intro & Preface & Contents

Previous: XI. If only





As often as I survey my bookshelves I am reminded of Lamb’s “ragged veterans.” Not that all my volumes came from the second-hand stall; many of them were neat enough in new covers, some were even stately in fragrant bindings, when they passed into my hands. But so often have I removed, so rough has been the treatment of my little library at each change of place, and, to tell the truth, so little care have I given to its well-being at normal times (for in all practical matters I am idle and inept), that even the comeliest of my books show the results of unfair usage. More than one has been foully injured by a great nail driven into a packing-case -- this but the extreme instance of the wrongs they have undergone. Now that I have leisure and peace of mind, I find myself growing more carefull -- an illustration of the great truth that virtue is made easy by circumstances. But I confess that, so long as a volume hold together, I am not much troubled as to its outer appearance.


I know men who say they had as lief read any book in a library copy as in one from their own shelf. To me that is unintelligible. For one thing, I know every book of mine by its scent, and I have but to put my nose between the pages to be reminded of all sorts of things. My Gibbon, for example, my well-bound eight volume Milman edition, which I have read and read and read again for more than thirty years -- never do I open it but the scent of the noble page restores to me all the exultant happiness of that moment when I received it as a prize...


... Dozens of my books were purchased with money which ought to have been spent upon what are called the necessaries of life. Many a time I have stood before a stall, or a bookseller’s window, torn by conflict of intellectual desire and bodily need. At the very hour of dinner, when my stomach clamoured for food, I have been stopped by sight of a volume so long coveted, and marked at so advantageous a price, that I could not let it go; yet to buy it meant pangs of famine...


... I sold my first edition of Gibbon for even less than it cost me; it went with a great many other fine books in folio and quarto, which I could not drag about with me in my constant removals; the man who bought them spoke of them as “tomb-stones.” Why has Gibbon no market value? Often has my heart ached with regret for those quartos. The joy of reading the Decline and Fall in that fine type! The page was appropriate to the dignity of the subject; the mere sight of it turned one’s mind...


Alpha.

My library dominates my small apartment and, while I’ve always preferred to buy books in modest paperback editions (because I am cheap and because who knows in advance if a book is going to be special) I now own a large number of volumes in hardback editions. But I doubt that any are of the quality Gissing is describing here. At best my volumes are covered in cloth and I believe he is talking about leather. My books that have a noticeable scent are the ones I’ve dragged along for decades and have fallen victim to mildew. The smell of printing ink is heaven to me, but I’ve never noticed that smell from the page of a book I’ve purchased.


My edition of Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (The Heritage Press with illustrations by Piranesi) happens to be one of the finest books in my collection. But the important thing for me is that this edition includes the footnotes on the outside of each page rather than in the back -- Gibbon tends to save his dry humor for the footnotes, which are particularly scathing when it comes to the Catholic Church.


I’ve read that you can open Gibbon at random and find a perfect English sentence. I’ve never tested that before but his prose style is at least as lovely as Jane Austen’s. (Why is the more recent Mr. Gissing’s prose so strange by comparison? Was this a Victorian fashion?) Here’s a random sentence from the first of my three volumes:


The Asiatic pomp, which had been adopted by the pride of Diocletian, assumed an air of softness and effeminacy in the person of Constantine.


That’s rather a short one so let’s try another, this time about Julian:


The unanimous evidence of his contemporaries is confirmed by the public and private declarations of the emperor himself; and his various writings express the uniform tenor of his religious sentiments, which policy would have prompted him to dissemble rather than to affect.


But here is my favorite quote from The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire,


In the purer ages of the [Roman] commonwealth, the use of arms was reserved for those ranks of citizens who had a country to love, a property to defend, and some share in enacting those laws, which it was their interest, as well as duty, to maintain.



Recently I was reading a library copy of Ram Dass’s Still Here. The book itself was interesting but not exceptional (his almost pathetic reliance on his guru seems to say more about Ram Dass’s perpetual need for solace than for the value of his guru’s teachings), but this particular edition was an absolute joy to read because of the typeface, the color of the ink and the overall design. But what pleased me about the typeface was that it was obviously a digital production. Every letter was perfect which you will never find with actual type. I somehow doubt Ryecroft/Gissing would have approved.


Last year I couldn’t leave Powell’s Books in Portland without the Everyman’s Library edition of The Magic Mountain. It’s a new translation and my old, paperback edition is getting quite ragged -- I told myself. But the truth is that the printed pages in that edition just looked lovely and I couldn’t resist. This turned out to be a wise decision as John E. Woods is kind enough to translate both the German and the French into English, something the previous translator failed to do, and a crucial passage in the book is in French.



Next: Spring XIII. Books cont.